Services · Token Governance
Do you know what your team's AI is costing you: per person, per month?
What it is
A governance layer between your employees and their AI tools.
Every query is logged, rate-limited, cached, and routed to the cheapest model capable of answering it. You get full visibility and control. You stop paying for the same question 40 times a day.
This is not a technology product. It is a cost-containment engagement. The CFO is the buyer. The trigger is the moment someone gave your team access to an AI tool with no follow-up about budgets or oversight.
Full spend visibility
Semantic caching
Smart model routing
Rate limiting and budgets
Compliance filters
Monthly savings report
Per-Team Budgets & Quotas
Model-Routing Policy
Prompt-Caching Strategy
Usage Analytics & Chargeback
Shadow-AI Discovery
Vendor-Contract Rightsizing
How it works
Audit first. Govern second. Compound from there.
The audit produces the discovery report. The governance layer installs the savings. Ongoing management keeps them compounding. No commitment required until you see the audit.
30-day audit: the discovery report
Governance layer deployment
Ongoing governance: compounding savings
Performance pricing
We only make real money when we save you real money.
Setup is a flat project fee covering the 30-day audit and governance layer deployment. After that, ongoing governance is priced as a percentage of monthly savings. The exact structure is scoped in the diagnostic and put in writing before you commit.
The math is straightforward: semantic caching eliminates a significant share of redundant queries, smart routing moves cheap work to cheap models, and our cut is a fraction of what we save you. If the savings are real, the fee is real. If the meter finds nothing, you have lost almost nothing.
Example above is illustrative. Actual savings depend on query volume, model mix, cache-hit rate, and routing efficiency.
Who it's for
The CFO is the buyer.
This is cost containment, not technology. Any company with 20 or more employees using AI tools and no controls qualifies. The qualifying question is simple: did someone give your team access to an AI tool without follow-up on budgets or oversight?
The qualifying signal
"We gave everyone access to [an AI tool]." No budget set, no visibility, no idea what it's costing. This is the conversation that starts the engagement.
The compliance angle
For regulated industries (healthcare, legal, financial services) the governance layer also adds PHI-blocking filters and a full audit trail. For those clients, this becomes a compliance product, not just a cost one.
The scale floor
We've deployed this for teams of 20 and organizations of 2,000. The economics work at both ends. The floor is wherever the monthly AI spend is meaningful enough to justify a meter.
The growth argument
If you're not spending much on AI yet, install the meter now. The audit establishes the baseline. When usage grows, and it will, the governance layer is already in place.
In practice
Three scenarios where the meter changes everything.
Dollar outcomes are illustrative where modeled. We label which is which.
Per-attorney monthly budgets enforce spend limits by timekeeper. Case-law lookup queries sent to the API dozens of times a day by different associates are cached on the second hit. Governance typically removes five figures per month from the AI bill. Full audit trail for each attorney's usage, with billable-matter attribution included.
Dollar outcomes illustrative
Repair summary generation is typically the highest-volume query across dealer locations. Semantic caching eliminates most of the redundancy. Monthly spend drops significantly once caching is tuned. Service advisors notice queries running faster, not slower.
Dollar outcomes illustrative
PHI flows to a cloud model with no audit trail and no blocking filters. The governance proxy adds PHI detection at the edge. Queries containing protected health information are blocked before they reach any external API. The compliance posture moves from exposed to defensible.
A note on scope
Token governance is often a low-risk place to start a relationship. The ROI is fast, the setup is contained, and the audit produces intelligence that informs everything else we build. But it is not a package. Like everything we do, it is scoped to your operation, and it is diagnostic-first. We start with the audit because the audit tells us what governance actually looks like for your team, not a generic template.
Questions
Straight answers.
Will this slow our people down?
No, and for repeated queries, it makes things faster. Semantic caching returns the answer in milliseconds when a query is similar to one already answered. Routing is invisible; employees use the same interfaces they always have. The governance layer is behind the scenes.
What if we barely spend anything on AI yet?
Then this is a governance and visibility play before the bill grows. The audit produces a baseline (usage patterns, model selection, cache-hit rate) that becomes the foundation when usage scales. Better to install the meter before the waste compounds than after.
How does the performance pricing work in practice?
We measure your baseline spend before the engagement starts. Every month, we compare current spend to the baseline, net of our infrastructure cost. Our cut is a percentage of the savings, with a small floor. If the meter finds nothing, you have lost almost nothing. The incentive is aligned. Exact structure is scoped in the diagnostic.
Engagement starts here
Find out what your AI is actually costing.
Book a diagnostic. We'll scope a 30-day audit and show you where the waste is, before you commit to anything.
Not limited to what's listed. Every engagement starts by assessing what your business actually needs, and we build whatever it requires.